Samsung Chairman Jay Y. Lee is found not guilty of fraud charges related to a controversial merger, but his future leadership of the tech giant may still be under scrutiny as the company faces growing competition.
Samsung Electronics Chairman Jay Y. Lee was acquitted of charges related to accounting fraud and stock manipulation by a Seoul appeals court on Monday, marking a significant legal victory for the business leader. This ruling could finally remove the long-standing legal risks that have loomed over Lee as he has faced a series of criminal cases in recent years.
The Seoul High Court upheld the previous decision to dismiss all charges in a case linked to a 2015 merger that prosecutors argued was designed to solidify Lee’s control over the South Korean tech giant. This ruling is especially important as Lee has faced years of legal battles that have distracted from his leadership role at Samsung, which is known as the world’s top memory chip and smartphone manufacturer.
“It took a long time. We hope with the latest ruling, the defendants would be able to focus on their work,” Lee’s lawyer, Kim You-jin, said after the court’s decision.
Lee has been embroiled in legal challenges for nearly a decade, starting with the 2015 merger between Samsung C&T and Cheil Industries, two affiliates of Samsung Group. This merger, worth $8 billion, was viewed as a key step in Lee’s succession plan after his father, Lee Kun-hee, suffered a heart attack in 2014 and was left in a coma. A lower court had cleared Lee of all charges related to the deal last year, but prosecutors appealed, arguing that Lee should be jailed for five years due to the alleged fraudulent accounting practices of Samsung BioLogics, an affiliate of Cheil Industries.
While the Seoul High Court acknowledged that Samsung BioLogics engaged in “inappropriate acts” such as document manipulation, the court ruled that the merger was justified, with financial outcomes that reflected the broader economic realities of the situation. The court also dismissed claims that the merger resulted in financial harm to Samsung C&T shareholders.
Lee has denied any wrongdoing, stating in court last November, “I never intended to deceive or damage investors for personal gain.”
The outcome of this case could have broader implications, though it is unclear whether the prosecution will appeal to the Supreme Court. Following the ruling, Samsung’s stock dropped by 2.7%, reflecting the potential uncertainty ahead for Lee and the company.
Despite the acquittal, some critics, including the civic group People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy, have expressed concerns about the leniency shown toward Lee, arguing that the merger strengthened his grip on the company at the expense of other investors, including the country’s pension fund. The group also pointed out that the court had ignored other legal rulings related to the case.
Lee’s legal troubles are not over, though. In addition to the ongoing fallout from the merger, Lee has faced past convictions. He served 18 months in jail for bribery charges before being released in 2021 as part of a broader political scandal that led to the impeachment of former President Park Geun-hye. In 2022, South Korea’s then-President Yoon Suk Yeol pardoned Lee, citing the business leader’s role in addressing the national economic crisis.
The 2015 merger has also sparked backlash from investors, including U.S. hedge fund Elliott, who raised questions about Samsung’s corporate governance and the way family-owned conglomerates prioritize the interests of family members over those of other shareholders. In 2023, the South Korean government was ordered to pay $108.5 million to Elliott for its role in approving the merger, which the hedge fund argued undervalued the assets involved.
In another development, the National Pension Service, once the largest shareholder in Samsung C&T, filed a lawsuit against Lee in 2023, claiming damages from the undervaluation of the company’s assets during the merger.
Despite these ongoing legal challenges, Park Ju-gun, head of the corporate analysis firm Leaders Index, suggested that the acquittal could provide a much-needed boost for Samsung, which has been facing business difficulties. However, he noted that the ruling also places additional pressure on Lee to prove his ability to lead the company, especially given its current struggles with competition in the semiconductor market.
Samsung Electronics has recently warned of sluggish sales of its artificial intelligence (AI) chips, with its main rival SK Hynix gaining ground by securing key contracts with Nvidia for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips. This shift has led to concerns that Samsung could miss out on much of the profit generated by the current AI boom, leaving Lee with the task of steering the company through an increasingly challenging landscape.
Leave a Reply